ArticleBMC medicine2026
Bowel cancer care in individuals with an intellectual disability: a population-based cohort study of symptoms, diagnostic pathways, treatment and survival.
Article in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPeople with an intellectual disability (ID) are at increased risk of bowel cancer. However, evidence on their presenting symptoms, diagnostic pathways, treatments and survival remains limited.
methodsA matched cohort study was conducted using linked primary care (Clinical Practice Research Datalink), hospital, cancer, and mortality records. Outcomes included symptoms associated with bowel cancer, faecal immunochemical or faecal occult blood (FIT/FOB) testing, urgent suspected cancer (USC) referral, endoscopy, surgery, systemic anticancer therapy (SACT), and bowel cancer-specific mortality. Adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRRs), risk ratios (aRRs), and hazard ratios (aHRs) were estimated using Poisson, modified Poisson and Cox regression.
resultsA total of 111,034 individuals with an ID were matched to 1,964,420 comparators. ID was associated with increased risk of bowel cancer (aHR 1.30, 1.18-1.44), particularly before age 50 years (aRR 2.19, 1.68-2.85). People with an ID presented more frequently with symptoms associated with bowel cancer (aIRR 2.59, 2.53-2.65) but, following such symptoms, were less likely to undergo FIT/FOB testing (aRR 0.74, 0.67-0.83), USC referral (aRR 0.57, 0.52-0.62), endoscopy (aRR 0.45, 0.42-0.49), or receive a diagnosis within 56 days (aRR 0.52, 0.41-0.67). They were also less likely to be diagnosed via screening (aRR 0.27, 0.14-0.50) or USC referral (aRR 0.62, 0.50-0.76), and more likely to be diagnosed via emergency presentation (aRR 1.76, 1.52-2.02), on the date of death (aRR 5.08, 2.92-8.84), or with stage IV disease (aRR 1.25, 1.01-1.56). ID was associated with similar proportions receiving curative surgery for stage I-III disease (aRR 0.98, 0.79-1.19), but markedly lower proportions receiving SACT for stage IV (aRR 0.15, 0.05-0.46), and higher bowel cancer-specific mortality across all stages (aHR 2.00, 1.71-2.33).
conclusionsPeople with an ID experience worse outcomes across nearly all stages of the bowel cancer care pathway, including referral, investigation, treatment and survival. Earlier screening may be justified given the elevated risk in those under age 50 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.