ArticleBMC surgery2026
A simplified strategy for chest wall reconstruction: locoregional flaps as a reliable alternative in resource-limited settings.
Article in BMC surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe reconstruction of complex chest wall defects resulting from advanced breast cancer poses a significant challenge in facilities lacking microsurgical expertise. This study aims to present a simplified, reliable, and easily reproducible locoregional flap strategy for these scenarios.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on four female patients who underwent immediate chest wall reconstruction following resection for locally advanced breast cancer between 2020 and 2022. A standardized protocol employing regional flaps, selected based on defect size and location, was used. Core principles included meticulous preservation of the blood supply, tension-free closure, and adequate drainage.
resultsThe chest wall defects ranged from 8 × 8 cm to 26.3 × 21.5 cm. The flaps used included lateral thoracic and pedicled abdominal flaps. All flaps survived completely (4/4). One patient with a massive defect experienced minor superficial skin compromise (approx. 3 cm) at the distal flap edge, which healed with conservative management. All defects were successfully addressed in a single stage, resulting in high patient satisfaction with the chest wall contour.
conclusionThis simplified locoregional flap strategy, which does not require microvascular anastomosis, is feasible strategy and has a short learning curve. Despite the limited number of cases, it is particularly suitable for promotion in primary hospitals or resource-limited settings, offering a practical solution for reconstructing complex chest wall defects in advanced breast cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.