ArticleBMC oral health2026
CBCT-based retrospective assessment of apical closure timing in permanent second molars.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based retrospective study was to evaluate the age-related prevalence of closed apices in permanent maxillary and mandibular second molars in a Turkish pediatric and adolescent population. Additionally, potential sex-related differences in closed apices were investigated. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study included 357 individuals (714 teeth) aged 12-21 years whose CBCT scans were retrieved from the digital archive. The apical status of permanent second molars was evaluated three-dimensionally using multiplanar reconstruction. According to root development, teeth were classified into two groups: those with closed apices in all roots and those with at least one open apex. Age was categorized into seven groups (12-12.99, 13-13.99, 14-14.99, 15-15.99, 16-16.99, 17-17.99, and ≥ 18 years). Associations between closed apices, age, and sex were analyzed using Pearson's chi-square test and Fisher's exact test (p < 0.05).
resultsThe prevalence of closed apices increased markedly with age in both jaws. Rates were low in the 12-12.99 age group (maxillary 2.1%; mandibular 5.4%), exceeded 60% by 14-14.99 years, and approached completion by 16-16.99 years, reaching 100% in individuals aged ≥ 18 years. Overall, no statistically significant difference was observed between permanent maxillary and mandibular second molars (p > 0.05). However, in the 13-13.99 and 14-14.99 age groups, females demonstrated significantly higher rates of closed apices than males in both jaws; in the 15-15.99 age group, this difference was significant only for permanent maxillary second molars (p < 0.05).
conclusionClosed apices in permanent second molars show a marked age-related increase and tend to occur earlier in females than in males during certain adolescent age groups. These findings support the use of closed apices in second molars as a reliable indicator for both endodontic treatment planning and forensic age estimation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Knowledge of the relationship between age and sex and the rates of closed apices in permanent second molars play an important role in both forensic dentistry and in endodontic and pediatric treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.