ArticleBMC primary care2026
Barriers and facilitators to implementing e-learning for infection management in primary care: a scoping review.
Article in BMC primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInfections are among the most common reasons for consultations in primary care, and appropriate infection management is essential to patient safety and antimicrobial stewardship. Educational interventions can improve diagnostic and prescribing practices, but in-person training is resource-intensive and difficult to scale. E-learning offers a flexible alternative; however, little is known about factors that influence its implementation in primary care.
objectiveTo identify barriers and facilitators to implementing e-learning interventions for infection management in primary care settings.
methodsA scoping review was conducted in accordance with established methodological guidance. Systematic searches across five databases was performed and updated in October 2025 to identify studies describing asynchronous, interactive e-learning interventions targeting infection management in primary care. Eligible studies were screened, and implementation determinants were extracted and mapped using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).
resultsSeven studies published between 2017 and 2025 were included, with implementation determinants typically reported alongside feasibility or contextual findings rather than as primary outcomes. Most studies employed quantitative designs, and one used mixed methods. Reported determinants were mainly mapped to the CFIR Innovation and Individuals domains, highlighting the importance of intervention design, adaptability, and perceived relevance for professional roles. Barriers frequently related to misalignment between intervention content and participants' level of expertise, platform complexity, and challenges related to IT infrastructure. Determinants related to organizational context, implementation processes, and external conditions were reported less frequently.
conclusionsThe available evidence on the implementation of e-learning for infection management in primary care is limited and heterogeneous. Future research should include more robust implementation studies, including qualitative approaches, to better capture the important determinants for implementation at the individual, organizational, and system levels. Such insights are needed to inform the development and implementation of scalable and sustainable e-learning interventions in primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.