ArticleCost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E2026
Cost-effectiveness of (sub)acute rehabilitation services for spinal cord injury: a retrospective cohort analysis.
Article in Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe global rise in disability and healthcare spending has intensified the need for cost-effective rehabilitation. Spinal cord injury/disease (SCI/D), though relatively rare, is associated with high costs and complex care needs, making it an ideal condition to study efficient resource allocation in rehabilitation.
methodsThis retrospective observational study included 375 patients with SCI/D from a Swiss SCI centre. Outcome of rehabilitation was measured using the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III). Latent class analysis identified three patient profiles. Cost-effectiveness was assessed by relating total costs to functional improvement, with logistic regression identifying predictors of efficient rehabilitation.
resultsThree distinct patient profiles showed significant differences in costs, service utilisation, and functional gains. Average efficiency-defined as achieving above-average functional improvement at below-average cost- was estimated at ΔSCIM III of 57, with a total cost of 118,000 Swiss francs. Efficient rehabilitation was most likely among patients. in profiles 1 and 2, younger with fewer comorbidities and with severe injuries.
conclusionsPatient segmentation enables targeted, equitable resource allocation in rehabilitation. Efficiency varies by patient profile, and even modest gains may be meaningful for severely impaired patients. A stratified cost-effectiveness evaluation is vital for policy and practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.