ArticleBMC oral health2026
Feasibility assessment of integrated oral health care pathways designed for pediatric and adult patients referred to School of Dentistry.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTransitioning from a treatment-oriented model to a prevention-focused approach is essential for improving oral health outcomes. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and implementation outcomes of Integrated Oral Health Care Pathways (IOHCPs) for pediatric and adult patients referred to a dental school setting.
methodsA four-month mixed-methods feasibility study was conducted at the School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. IOHCPs were implemented for pediatric and adult patients using risk-based preventive care, oral health education, and structured follow-up. Participants were allocated into three groups (control, routine care, and IOHCP intervention). The study followed the Donabedian framework (structure, process, and outcomes). Clinical outcomes (OHI-S, DMFT, and bleeding on probing [BOP]) and behavioral indicators were assessed. Process indicators were evaluated between routine care and IOHCP groups. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to assess structural feasibility. Statistical analyses included trend tests, chi-square tests, and independent t-tests, with a significance level of 0.05.
resultsA total of 780 patients (420 adults and 360 children) were included. OHI-S showed a significant improvement across groups in both adults (2.75 to 1.88) and children (2.29 to 1.25; p < 0.001). Behavioral indicators demonstrated favorable trends in the IOHCP group, including increased tooth brushing frequency and higher preventive care uptake (p < 0.001). Process indicators showed marked improvement in the delivery of preventive services in the IOHCP group compared to routine care (p < 0.001). DMFT increased in adults over time, reflecting cumulative disease experience, while no significant change was observed in children. Differences in BOP between routine care and IOHCP groups were not statistically significant.
conclusionThe implementation of Integrated Oral Health Care Pathways in a dental educational setting was feasible and acceptable. The pathways improved preventive care delivery processes and were associated with favorable oral hygiene behaviors. However, changes in clinical disease indicators were limited within the short study period. Further long-term studies are needed to evaluate sustainability and clinical impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.