ArticleCommunications medicine2026
Sex disparities in young adults aged 20-40 with acute coronary syndrome.
Article in Communications medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSex disparities in young adults aged 20-40 with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are rarely known in China. We aimed to explore these sex-based differences, using a nationwide, population-based database.
methodsClinical data of patients with ACS (n = 89,772) registered in the Chinese Cardiovascular Association (CCA) Database-Chest Pain Centre were analyzed, including ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI, 57.7%), non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI, 20.7%), and unstable angina (UA, 21.5%) across males (94.0%) and females (6.0%).
resultsYoung males show a significantly higher rate of diagnostic assessment (P < 0.05) and receive approximately a 2-fold higher treatment rate than females. Young males observe a higher risk (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.74, 95%CI: 2.40, 3.14) of STEMI than females. Young males aged below 24 years show a 2-fold higher in-hospital mortality (IHM) than females. Young females show a higher risk (aOR 3.23, 95%CI: 2.84, 3.67) of UA compared with males. Hypertension is associated with a higher risk of NSTEMI and UA in young males. Young females and modifiable risk factors show a positive interaction effect on the risk of STEMI and NSTEMI, whereas young males and modifiable risk factors show a positive interaction effect on the risk of UA.
conclusionsYoung males with ACS show higher access to medical care and a higher risk of STEMI, while young females have a higher risk of UA. Furthermore, males below 24 years have higher IHM compared to age-matched females. These disparities underscore the need for sex-specific interventions to reduce ACS incidence and improve early outcomes in young patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.