SynthesisNature human behaviour2026
A systematic investigation reveals dissociable effects of ageing on implicit and explicit components of sensorimotor learning.
Synthesis in Nature human behaviour, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Isolating error-based and reward-based learning in a real-world task via gradual perturbations in embodied VR.iScience · 2026Article
- Article
- Hypothesis testing governs strategic motor learning.NPJ science of learning · 2026Article
- Mistaking Covariance for Combination in Sensorimotor Adaptation: Regression Slopes Do Not Test Additivity.eNeuro · 2026Article
- Sensorimotor Adaptation to a Nonuniform Formant Perturbation Is Preserved in Healthy Aging.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026Article
- Distinct roles of brain network flexibility in motor learning across age.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deterioration in motor control is a hallmark of ageing, significantly contributing to a decline in quality of life. More controversial is the question of whether and how ageing impacts sensorimotor learning. We hypothesized that the inconsistent picture observed in current literature can be attributed to at least two factors. First, ageing studies tend to be underpowered. Second, the learning assays used in these experiments tend to reflect, to varying degrees, the operation of multiple learning processes, making it difficult to make inferences across studies. Here we took a two-pronged approach to address these issues. We first performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of sensorimotor adaptation literature focusing on outcome measures that provide estimates of explicit and implicit components of adaptation. We then conducted four well-powered experiments, two of which were preregistered, to systematically examine the effect of ageing on sensorimotor adaptation, using behavioural tasks designed to isolate explicit and implicit processes. Convergently, both approaches revealed a striking dissociation: Older adults showed a pronounced deficit in discovering new explicit strategies yet a marked enhancement in implicit recalibration. Follow-up studies revealed that the explicit re-aiming deficit stems from impaired caching of stimulus-response mappings rather than from failures to implement parametric algorithms. The enhancement in implicit recalibration is linked to age-related changes in the multisensory integration of proprioceptive and visual information. Together, these systematic, meta-analytic and empirical findings advance our understanding of how ageing differentially impacts the mechanisms underlying sensorimotor learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42157004What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.