ArticleScientific reports2026
Development of colorimetric and machine learning based accurate glucose detection platform for point of care applications.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Improving overall health and preventing complications is crucial for timely and effective treatment of diabetes patients. In this direction, accurate measurement and detection of glucose concentration in blood is essential. The aim of this study is to develop an affordable, reliable and accurate Point-of-Care (POC) diagnostic platform for glucose concentration detection using microfluidic and colorimetric principles. A microfluidic chip is fabricated which provides the base for efficient colorimetric reaction. The proposed system requires only ~ 20 µL of sample per microwell, with a colorimetric reaction time of 3-4 min. The chip is positioned inside a compact, USB-powered, 3D printed image capture device affixed with a high-resolution camera so that variables such as camera position, focal distance and lighting conditions can be controlled. The analysis workflow is adaptable for integration with embedded systems or laptops, making it suitable for real-time deployment in Point-of-Care settings without the need for smartphones or calibration tools. The images captured inside the device (1280 in total, corresponding to 16 glucose concentration levels ranging from 50 to 200 mg/dL) were labeled based on known concentration levels and subjected to standardized preprocessing. Key preprocessing steps included Region of Interest (ROI) extraction using a fixed box detection algorithm, normalization of pixel values, image resizing to 128 × 128 pixels, and standardization using ImageNet parameters. These ensured uniformity and robustness prior to feature extraction and machine learning classification. The classifiers used are Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Neural Networks (NN), and K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN). The RF machine learning classifier achieved the highest cross-validation accuracy of 87.47% and precision of 89.14%, demonstrating its ability to effectively distinguish between different glucose concentration levels. The confusion matrix and ROC curve analysis further validated the model's robustness, with minimal misclassifications and a high mean AUC value of 0.9509. The results thus highlight the potential of image-based glucose concentration estimation as a cost-effective and scalable solution for real-time monitoring in biomedical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.