Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42156984›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Comprehensive study of the influence of reinforcements on the deformation mechanism and energy absorption performance of auxetic structure.

Vítězslav Sobol, Ondřej Červinek, Jan Jaroš, Melanie Todt, Jakub Hurník, Daniel Koutný

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vítězslav SobolFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Machine and Industrial Design, Brno University of Technology, Technická 2896/2, 616 69, Brno, Czech Republic. Vitezslav.Sobol@vut.cz.
Ondřej ČervinekFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Machine and Industrial Design, Brno University of Technology, Technická 2896/2, 616 69, Brno, Czech Republic.
Jan JarošFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Machine and Industrial Design, Brno University of Technology, Technická 2896/2, 616 69, Brno, Czech Republic.
Melanie TodtInstitute of Lightweight Design and Structural Biomechanics, Technische Universitaet Wien, Karlsplatz 13, 1040, Vienna, Austria.
Jakub HurníkFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Machine and Industrial Design, Brno University of Technology, Technická 2896/2, 616 69, Brno, Czech Republic.
Daniel KoutnýFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Machine and Industrial Design, Brno University of Technology, Technická 2896/2, 616 69, Brno, Czech Republic.

Funding

European Commission 101079091European Commission CZ.02.01.01/00/22_008/0004634Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky NW25-08-00044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing speed of transportation requires outstanding performance of energy absorbers used in passive safety systems. These absorbers must deform at approximately constant force to safely dissipate kinetic energy during a collision. Structured materials exhibit a superior energy-absorption-to-weight ratio compared to bulk materials. Auxetic structures, with a negative Poisson's ratio due to their unique internal geometry, further improve load redistribution and indentation resistance. However, their absorption capacity remains limited relative to conventional structures. Because no established method exists to systematically enhance the absorption capacity of auxetic structures, this study investigates the use of reinforcements and explains how they influence plastic hinge formation and the resulting energy dissipation mechanisms. Structures represented by reinforced re-entrant honeycomb are manufactured using Laser Powder Bed Fusion additive technology from stainless steel 316L and NiTi alloy. Complex experimental and numerical analyses show that reinforcements in re-entrant honeycomb improve absorption capacity mainly due to contact between deformed reinforcements and horizontal walls, rather than to the formation of new plastic hinges. By optimising the reinforcement placement, the unit cell can absorb three times more energy per unit mass than without reinforcements. Samples from NiTi alloy theoretically outperform those from stainless steel 316L in absorption capacity, but its practical applicability is constrained by LPBF processing challenges. Finally, a new Double Re-entrant Honeycomb structure is designed that can absorb more than 70% of energy per unit mass compared to the reference geometry, while decreasing engineering stress fluctuations by approximately 36%.

Indexed as

Auxetic structureEnergy absorptionLaser powder bed fusion (LPBF)NiTi alloyReinforcementsStainless steel 316L

Identifiers

PMID42156984
PMCPMC13389475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.