ArticleScientific reports2026
Seasonal shifts in Leopard (Panthera pardus) occupancy driven by prey availability and proximity to human settlements in Margalla Hills National Park, Pakistan.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The common leopard (Panthera pardus) is critically endangered in Pakistan, yet quantitative habitat assessments remain absent from the Himalayan foothills. This study provides the first detection-corrected occupancy assessment of leopards in Margalla Hills National Park (MHNP) using four years of systematic camera-trap data (2021-2024) across 20 sites and 2,400 sampling occasions per season. We modelled seasonal occupancy and detection probability during summer (May-August) and winter (November-February) using environmental and anthropogenic covariates. In summer, the null detection model was top-ranked (weight = 0.59), while prey relative abundance index (RAI) was the strongest occupancy predictor (β = 3.18 ± 1.31 SE, P = 0.015; ψ = 0.39 ± 0.19 SE). In winter, prey RAI strongly predicted detection probability (β = 0.437 ± 0.071 SE, P < 0.001), and occupancy was highest at sites distant from human settlements (β = 4.72 ± 2.19 SE, P = 0.031; ψ = 0.89 ± 0.13 SE), indicating active human-area avoidance during a season of heightened spatial overlap. These findings demonstrate the primacy of prey availability in driving leopard space use and identify settlement proximity as a key winter occupancy determinant. Conservation requires prey management, seasonal regulation of human activity in core leopard zones, and landscape-level planning across the MHNP-Murree Hills-Ayubia corridor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.