Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42156935›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Layer-specific feature preference in a trained AlexNet model revealed by stylized image analysis.

Nobuhiko Wagatsuma, Kazuma Ito, Akinori Hidaka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nobuhiko WagatsumaDepartment of Information Science, Faculty of Science, Toho University, 2-2-1 Miyama, Funabashi, Chiba, 274-8510, Japan. nwagatsuma@is.sci.toho-u.ac.jp.
Kazuma ItoDepartment of Information Science, Faculty of Science, Toho University, 2-2-1 Miyama, Funabashi, Chiba, 274-8510, Japan.
Akinori HidakaSchool of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Denki University, Saitama, Japan.

Funding

the Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grants JP23H03697
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) achieve high object classification performance; however, how representational preferences systematically evolve across hierarchical layers remains unclear. Although previous studies using stylized images have revealed texture biases at the output level, it remains unclear how representational preference changes across internal layers. Here, we quantitatively show a layer-wise transition along the AlexNet hierarchy, from organization dominated by content-related low- and mid-level structural cues in early and intermediate convolutional layers to style-related organization in higher fully connected layers. Using correlation analyses, uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP), and quantitative neighborhood-based metrics, we identified distinct representational structures across layers. Early and intermediate convolutional layers showed high response similarity between natural and stylized images and were primarily organized according to content-related structural cues, including edges, contours, and coarse spatial layout. In contrast, higher fully connected layers formed clusters determined by texture and material properties derived from style images. These results provide a quantitative demonstration, within a trained AlexNet model, of a layer-wise transition from content-related encoding in early convolutional layers to style-related encoding in higher layers. Our findings clarify how hierarchical representations are reorganized across stages of AlexNet and provide a benchmark for future comparisons with more recent architectures.

Indexed as

AlexNetDeep convolutional neural networkModel neuron preferenceObject classificationUMAP

Identifiers

PMID42156935
PMCPMC13385648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.