ArticleScientific reports2026
Divergent trajectories of psychological distress during the prolonged COVID-19 pandemic in Japan.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Psychological responses to the COVID-19 pandemic showed heterogeneous trajectories rather than uniform recovery. We analyzed seven waves of nationwide web-based surveys conducted in Japan between June 2020 and December 2022 (approximately 1,000 participants per wave) to examine long-term trends in depression, anxiety, and stress and their associations with self-evaluative traits. DASS-21 scores were significantly elevated during the initial emergency phase (June 2020) and declined substantially thereafter (Kruskal-Wallis tests, all p < .001). However, distributional analyses indicated that a subgroup of individuals remained persistently distressed despite overall population-level improvement. Decision-tree-based variable-importance analyses identified the impostor phenomenon as the strongest contributor to depression, anxiety, and stress, followed by self-esteem. For anxiety, survey timing showed the strongest linear association, whereas non-linear models consistently highlighted self-evaluative variables as dominant predictors. These findings indicate that prolonged societal crises are associated with divergent mental-health adaptation patterns. Psychological self-evaluation factors, particularly impostor feelings and low self-esteem, may play a central role in persistent distress beyond demographic and social-network factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.