ArticleEye (London, England)2026
Patient and staff experiences of a community-based diagnostic clinic for chronic eye conditions: Qualitative analysis.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the UK, ophthalmology appointment delays are a longstanding issue, with serious implications for population health, and were exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. In response to these pressures, a major eye hospital organisation established a community-based clinic providing testing for stable glaucoma and medical retina patients in a London shopping centre. This clinic reduced appointment delays significantly. However, little is known about how patients and staff experience services of this kind.
objectivesTo understand experiences of patients attending and staff working in this clinic.
methodSemi-structured interviews with staff (n = 29) and patients (n = 9). Observations of service delivery (n = 6). Data were analysed thematically.
resultsFour themes were identified: (1) delivering eye appointments; (2) clinic setting; (3) communication and engagement; and (4) future of diagnostic clinics. Patients were overwhelmingly positive about their experiences of the clinic, citing shorter appointment lengths and supportive, friendly technicians. Some patients found the clinic harder to reach than their local hospital, but noted this would not prevent future attendance. Technicians enjoyed working at the clinic and felt valued, whilst describing challenges in communicating with offsite clinicians and concerns about professional development. Staff and patients supported future use of services of this kind.
conclusionsPatients and staff experienced this community-based eye clinic very positively. This, alongside the clinic's impact on appointment delays, suggests that such clinics may be valuable in future. Services of this kind may be optimised and sustained in future by enhancing pre- and post-appointment patient communication, providing transport solutions, and strengthening technician career development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.