Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42156917›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2026

Patient and staff experiences of a community-based diagnostic clinic for chronic eye conditions: Qualitative analysis.

Angus I G Ramsay, Joy Adesanya, Juan Carlos Bazo-Alvarez, Helen Baker, Jocelyn Cammack, Caroline S Clarke, Holly Elphinstone, German Alarcon Garavito, Sir Peng Tee Khaw, Stephanie Kumpunen and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Angus I G RamsayResearch Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London (UCL), London, UK. angus.ramsay@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4446-6916
Joy AdesanyaMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-3867-2774
Juan Carlos Bazo-AlvarezResearch Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London (UCL), London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6169-8049
Helen BakerNational Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2916-9443
Jocelyn CammackNational Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2351-5368
Caroline S ClarkeResearch Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London (UCL), London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4676-1257
Holly ElphinstoneResearch Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London (UCL), London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-3850-2128
German Alarcon GaravitoResearch Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London (UCL), London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2856-4356
Sir Peng Tee KhawNational Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8087-2268
Stephanie KumpunenResearch Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London (UCL), London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7668-8687
Grant MillsThe Bartlett School of Sustainable Construction, UCL, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3792-7227
Dhakshi MuhundhakumarNational Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0480-9574
Steve NapierNational Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.
Siyabonga NdwandweResearch Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London (UCL), London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4449-8926
Peter ScullyThe Bartlett School of Sustainable Construction, UCL, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7682-635X
Anne SymonsThe Bartlett School of Sustainable Construction, UCL, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5882-7308
Hari JayaramMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1998-0670
Sobha SivaprasadMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8952-0659
Paul J FosterMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4755-177X
Naomi J FulopResearch Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London (UCL), London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5306-6140
HERCULES research consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the UK, ophthalmology appointment delays are a longstanding issue, with serious implications for population health, and were exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. In response to these pressures, a major eye hospital organisation established a community-based clinic providing testing for stable glaucoma and medical retina patients in a London shopping centre. This clinic reduced appointment delays significantly. However, little is known about how patients and staff experience services of this kind.

objectivesTo understand experiences of patients attending and staff working in this clinic.

methodSemi-structured interviews with staff (n = 29) and patients (n = 9). Observations of service delivery (n = 6). Data were analysed thematically.

resultsFour themes were identified: (1) delivering eye appointments; (2) clinic setting; (3) communication and engagement; and (4) future of diagnostic clinics. Patients were overwhelmingly positive about their experiences of the clinic, citing shorter appointment lengths and supportive, friendly technicians. Some patients found the clinic harder to reach than their local hospital, but noted this would not prevent future attendance. Technicians enjoyed working at the clinic and felt valued, whilst describing challenges in communicating with offsite clinicians and concerns about professional development. Staff and patients supported future use of services of this kind.

conclusionsPatients and staff experienced this community-based eye clinic very positively. This, alongside the clinic's impact on appointment delays, suggests that such clinics may be valuable in future. Services of this kind may be optimised and sustained in future by enhancing pre- and post-appointment patient communication, providing transport solutions, and strengthening technician career development.

Indexed as

Community Health ServicesCOVID-19Eye DiseasesOphthalmologyAdultAgedAppointments and SchedulesAttitude of Health PersonnelChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansLondonMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID42156917
PMCPMC13416069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.