Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42156891›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

The effect of boron oxide(B₂O₃) and colemanite(2CaO·3B

Ali İhsan Çelik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ali İhsan ÇelikDepartment of Construction, Tomarza Mustafa Akincioglu Vocational School, Kayseri University, Kayseri, 38940, Turkey. acelik@kayseri.edu.tr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, the aerating effect and contribution to mechanical performance of boron oxide (B₂O₃) and colemanite (2CaO·3B₂O₃·5 H₂O) in ground raw perlite (GRP)-based lightweight geopolymer concrete (GPLC) were investigated. Recent studies on lightweight geopolymer concrete have shown that, despite the advantage of low density, there are significant limitations in simultaneously achieving environmental sustainability, diverse production methods, adequate mechanical strength, and high-temperature performance. Instead of GRP, boron compounds were used at ratios of 5%, 10%, and 15%; a fixed amount of GGBFS and silica fume (SF) was added to improve bonding. Expanded perlite (EP) aggregate of 2-4 mm was used for lightness, and carbon fiber (CF) at ratios of 0%, 1%, and 2% was used for strength. Additionally, a hyperplasticizer was added at a rate of 1.93% of the total binder and activators to improve workability. The gel structure and phase formation were examined using FE-SEM, EDX, and F-TIR analyses; regression and Taguchi methods determined the optimized parameters. The findings showed that 2CaO·3B₂O₃·5 H₂O formed a more homogeneous, but less ductile N-A-S-H network, while B₂O₃ provided a denser matrix and higher compressive strength with hybrid N-A-S-H/C-A-S-H gels. In high-temperature tests, both boron additions increased secondary phase formation and thermal stability. The best performance was achieved with a 10% boron content and a 2% CF mixture, offering a balance of low density, high strength, and high post-fire resistance.

Indexed as

Boron oxideColemaniteElevated-temperature behaviorGround raw perliteLightweight geopolymer concrete

Identifiers

PMID42156891
PMCPMC13381879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.