ArticleScientific reports2026
Enhanced fuel economy and emission reduction in parallel HEV powertrains through swarm and deterministic algorithms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This work presents a comprehensive optimization study for enhancing the performance of a Parallel Hybrid Electric Vehicle (PHEV). The primary objectives were the simultaneous improvement of fuel economy and the reduction of pollutant emissions, namely CO, HC, and NOx, while ensuring all driving performance requirements were met. A multi-objective optimization (MLO) framework was developed and implemented using both the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and DIRECT algorithms, with their performance evaluated against a mono-objective (MNO) approach and a pre-optimized baseline model. Simulations were conducted over standard driving cycles (UDDS and HWFET) using the ADVISOR/Simulink environment. The results demonstrate that the MLO-PSO algorithm is the most effective strategy, successfully converging to superior solutions that significantly outperform both the baseline vehicle and the MNO results. Key improvements included a marked increase in the operational efficiency of the Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) and Electric Motor (EM), smarter battery State of Charge (SOC) management, and a concurrent reduction in fuel consumption and emissions. Under the UDDS cycle, PSO-based optimization achieves fuel consumption reductions of up to 13.74%, compared to 10.33% obtained with the DIRECT method. CO emission reductions with PSO range from 13.26% to 13.41%, while DIRECT achieves higher CO reductions of up to 17.2%. HC emission reductions under UDDS reach 15.66% with MLO-PSO, compared to 14.56% with MNO-DIRECT. Under the HWFET cycle, PSO further improves fuel economy, reaching a maximum reduction of 16.92%, while DIRECT achieves up to 13.33%. MLO-PSO also enables limited emission benefits, including a slight NOx reduction of 0.61% under HWFET, highlighting the trade-off between fuel economy and emission control. The simulation results demonstrate that PSO-based strategies has remarkable superiority in MLO. This study conclusively shows that a properly weighted MLO approach is essential for overcoming the inherent trade-offs in PHEV design, resulting in a vehicle that is more efficient, less polluting, and performs reliably.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.