Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42156882›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2026

Effect of dual task ladder training on physical function among badminton players.

Lingwei Bai, Victor S Selvanayagam

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lingwei BaiUniversity of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia.
Victor S SelvanayagamUniversity of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia. 894376908@qq.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This randomized controlled trial examined the effects of six weeks of agility ladder training with different visuomotor integration modes on physical performance in adolescent badminton players. Thirty-six athletes were randomly assigned to a dual-task agility ladder group (ADG), a traditional sequential training group (TG), or a control group (CG). The ADG performed agility ladder drills concurrently with a reactive visuomotor task (tennis-ball catching), whereas the TG completed the same agility and reactive components in a sequential manner. Both intervention groups demonstrated significant within-group improvements in 20-m sprint time, SEMO agility performance, and sport-specific change-of-direction ability (all p < 0.05). Notably, only the ADG showed a significant reduction in reaction time (p = 0.012). Between-group analyses of change scores revealed significant differences in sprint performance and reaction time (both p < 0.05), with the ADG demonstrating greater improvements compared with the control group. No significant differences were observed between ADG and TG for most physical outcomes. These findings suggest that while agility ladder training enhances general speed and agility, the simultaneous integration of a reactive visuomotor task may confer additional benefits for reaction performance. This ecologically oriented training approach provides a practical strategy for improving sensorimotor responsiveness in youth badminton players.

Indexed as

AthletesAthletic PerformanceRacquet SportsAdolescentDual-Task TestsHumansMalePsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeAgility ladderBadmintonCognitive–motor integrationDual-task training

Identifiers

PMID42156882
PMCPMC13385766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.