ArticleScientific reports2026
Energy-efficient information processing and eligibility-trace plasticity in the Drosophila optic lobe connectome.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sensory circuits operate under finite metabolic budgets, so their information processing should be evaluated together with energetic cost. Using structural graph models, connectome-constrained dynamics, and an explicit energy proxy, we quantify energy-information trade-offs in the Drosophila optic lobe connectome. Cell-type symmetries compress connectome description length by 9-16% relative to independent-edge baselines, showing that a substantial fraction of the wiring diagram is statistically regular rather than idiosyncratic. In a canonical four-way motion-decoding regime, the real connectome supports above-chance decoding and a positive decoder-based mutual-information lower bound ([Formula: see text] bits across seeds), whereas label shuffling and connectivity shuffling collapse the bound to zero. In a separate energy-efficiency regime with topology- and weight-matched nulls, absolute decoder bounds depend on the operating point and null family, so we focus on efficiency within that regime rather than on raw information differences across regimes. Under this comparison, the real network achieves lower total energy than the connectivity null (Real/Null_Conn [Formula: see text]) and higher bits-per-energy across the tested cost-weight sweep. Across retinotopic patches and compute-matched budgets, eligibility-trace plasticity (E-prop) aligns learned wiring geometry to the connectome more efficiently than REINFORCE-style policy gradients. Additional trajectory and motif analyses show that this advantage is visible over training, while motif similarity and geometry alignment capture partly distinct aspects of biological realism. Taken together, these results support a conservative interpretation: the optic lobe connectome contains compressible structure, that structure supports decodable signal, the real graph is more energy-efficient than matched nulls within the Part D regime, and eligibility-trace learning provides a plausible route toward that regime.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.