Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42156870›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Energy-efficient information processing and eligibility-trace plasticity in the Drosophila optic lobe connectome.

Nalin Dhiman, Siddharth Panwar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nalin DhimanSchool of Computing and Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Mandi, Mandi, India. d24008@students.iitmandi.ac.in.
Siddharth PanwarSchool of Computing and Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Mandi, Mandi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory circuits operate under finite metabolic budgets, so their information processing should be evaluated together with energetic cost. Using structural graph models, connectome-constrained dynamics, and an explicit energy proxy, we quantify energy-information trade-offs in the Drosophila optic lobe connectome. Cell-type symmetries compress connectome description length by 9-16% relative to independent-edge baselines, showing that a substantial fraction of the wiring diagram is statistically regular rather than idiosyncratic. In a canonical four-way motion-decoding regime, the real connectome supports above-chance decoding and a positive decoder-based mutual-information lower bound ([Formula: see text] bits across seeds), whereas label shuffling and connectivity shuffling collapse the bound to zero. In a separate energy-efficiency regime with topology- and weight-matched nulls, absolute decoder bounds depend on the operating point and null family, so we focus on efficiency within that regime rather than on raw information differences across regimes. Under this comparison, the real network achieves lower total energy than the connectivity null (Real/Null_Conn [Formula: see text]) and higher bits-per-energy across the tested cost-weight sweep. Across retinotopic patches and compute-matched budgets, eligibility-trace plasticity (E-prop) aligns learned wiring geometry to the connectome more efficiently than REINFORCE-style policy gradients. Additional trajectory and motif analyses show that this advantage is visible over training, while motif similarity and geometry alignment capture partly distinct aspects of biological realism. Taken together, these results support a conservative interpretation: the optic lobe connectome contains compressible structure, that structure supports decodable signal, the real graph is more energy-efficient than matched nulls within the Part D regime, and eligibility-trace learning provides a plausible route toward that regime.

Indexed as

ConnectomeDrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterEnergy MetabolismNeuronal PlasticityOptic Lobe, NonmammalianAnimals

Identifiers

PMID42156870
PMCPMC13385933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.