ArticleScientific reports2026
Screening for depression risk via smartphone narratives with fully fine-tuned WavLM.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Scalable, low-burden tools are needed to identify individuals at risk of depression before progressing to a clinically significant level of depressive disorder. We evaluated a smartphone framework for subclinical-depression risk using self-supervised speech representations and a field-ready data-collection protocol. Participants (N = 119) were stratified into high-risk (PHQ-9 ≥ 10; n = 64) and low-risk (n = 55) groups. A mobile app elicited two 1-minute narrative recordings using negative and positive mood-induction tasks, separated by a 10-minute neutral interval. We compared four models: extreme gradient boosting on handcrafted features; a convolutional neural network-recurrent neural network (CNN-RNN) on mel-spectrograms; head-only WavLM-MLP; and fully fine-tuned WavLM (WavLM-FT). Performance was estimated using 5-fold cross-validation (CV) and out-of-fold (OOF) aggregation. In a 5-fold CV, WavLM-FT achieved the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.90, area under the precision-recall curve of 0.90, F1 of 0.73, accuracy of 0.68, recall of 0.89, and precision of 0.65. In OOF subject-level predictions, WavLM-FT led (ROC-AUC 0.86; accuracy 0.79) and outperformed CNN-RNN and WavLM-MLP. Results suggest full-model adaptation captures informative paralinguistic cues within standardized smartphone recordings. A brief, ecologically valid protocol with self-supervised learning may enable scalable, non-invasive depression-risk screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.