ArticleScientific reports2026
Fisher duty interval and particle swarm optimization for neural architecture search.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Automatically constructing Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) has become a key focus in artificial intelligence research, as their performance is highly dependent on the architecture and parameters of the network. Careful selection of the architecture and parameters for specific tasks can significantly improve the network's output. This study proposes an intelligent and efficient framework for Neural Architecture Search (NAS) by integrating Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), the concept of Fisher Duty Interval (FDI), Transfer Learning (TL), and graph-based architecture representation. Given the high dependency of DNN performance on architecture design, narrowing the search space and guiding it toward promising regions is essential for improving model effectiveness. In the initial phase, the Fisher Information Matrix (FIM) is used to compute the statistical distance FDI between the target task and a set of previously solved tasks. This serves as the basis for TL, allowing the generation of informed initial particles from previously successful architectures. PSO then performs a multi-level search, balancing global and local exploration. In early iterations, candidate architectures are evaluated relative to baseline architectures, while in later stages, comparison shifts dynamically toward the global best particle. Architectures are encoded as Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs) with cell-based modules, allowing for heterogeneous and flexible designs where each cell can have a distinct structure. Additionally, weight inheritance and FIM-based performance estimation reduce the need for full training during each iteration, minimizing computational cost. Overall, this framework leverages prior knowledge, reduces search complexity, and efficiently explores the architecture space to discover models that outperform baseline designs and random search results. The effectiveness of this approach has been tested through classification tasks on well-known datasets, with comprehensive results reported accordingly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.