ArticleScientific reports2026
Robust transcriptomic signatures of Alzheimer's disease progression: validated explainable AI approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The lack of validated stage-specific biomarkers hampers the understanding of Alzheimer's disease (AD) progression and clinical translation. Current transcriptomic methods often produce unstable results with limited stage discrimination. We aimed to develop an explainable machine learning pipeline to identify robust, interpretable gene signatures linked to distinct AD neuropathological stages. We analyzed multi-region transcriptomic data from the MSBB cohort using a multi-class XGBoost-SHAP-driven framework. Class imbalance was addressed using SMOTE, and model robustness was assessed through cross-validation and permutation-based validation. Our pipeline accurately classified Early, Mid, and Late Braak stages and achieved accurate Braak stage classification (regional ROC AUCs up to 0.76). The method identified a concise set of high-confidence, stage-specific genes, showing minimal signature overlap (~ 1.7%). Key validated novel candidate biomarkers included ARX (Early), MKNK2 (Mid), and SLC25A16/NEURL1B (Late), linked to GABAergic, inflammatory, mitochondrial, and synaptic pathways. This explainable framework overcomes key limitations of conventional analyses, providing a stable, interpretable gene signature for AD staging. It establishes a robust method for transcriptional biomarker discovery and offers new biological insight into AD progression, highlighting potential stage-specific therapeutic targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.