ArticleScientific reports2026
Attention-augmented hybrid framework with evolutionary optimization for robust deepfake detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The widespread availability of powerful generative models, such as Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and Autoencoders, has led to a dramatic surge in deepfake content production. These synthetically generated videos, often indistinguishable from authentic ones, pose a growing threat to digital trust and can facilitate misinformation, identity fraud, and social manipulation. While various deepfake detection models have been proposed, many struggle to maintain consistent performance across datasets and unseen video formats, revealing a clear research gap in generalizability and temporal feature modeling. In this proposed work, we introduce a novel deepfake detection framework that incorporates a customized Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) architecture enhanced with a deep-fake-specific gating mechanism. This newly designed gate modifies the candidate hidden state update, enabling the network to more effectively capture temporal inconsistencies and facial dynamics in manipulated video sequences. The objective of this study is to design a deepfake detection system that not only performs with high accuracy but also generalizes well across varying datasets and video conditions. The proposed methodology employs a multi-stage pipeline. Vision Transformers (ViTs) are used initially to extract frame-level spatial features, followed by pretrained Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) such as MobileNetV2 to refine feature representations. These features are then given to a hybrid GRU architecture, combining both the standard and custom GRU unit, thereby enhancing sequential learning. The performance of the model is maximized by employing a Genetic Algorithm for optimizing GRU, number of layers and hyperparameter tuning. Benchmark datasets such as Celeb-DF V2 and FaceForensics + + have been utilized to train and test the system. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods, achieving superior accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and ROC-AUC compared to all evaluated models. The proposed framework demonstrates strong generalization to unseen data and significantly reduces false positive rates. This provides a scalable and adaptive approach to deepfake detection by combining novel recurrent neural architecture with evolutionary optimization algorithms, demonstrating effectiveness on diverse datasets such as digital forensics, content verification system and policy enforcement platforms aimed at mitigating deepfake threats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.