ArticleScientific reports2026
Effects of chilling, fluorescent dust marking, and X-ray irradiation on the quality of male Anopheles arabiensis for sterile insect technique applications.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malaria remains a major public health challenge in sub-Saharan Africa, with Anopheles arabiensis an important vector in several regions. Increasing insecticide resistance and flexible vector behavior limit the effectiveness of conventional control measures. The sterile insect technique (SIT) offers a complementary approach through the release of sterile males, with program success dependent on male quality. This study assessed the effects of chilling, fluorescent dust marking, and X-ray irradiation on the quality of laboratory-reared male An. arabiensis. Adult males were assigned to six treatment groups combining chilling, irradiation, and marking in different sequences. Male quality was evaluated through recovery, escape rates, reproductive performance, and longevity under standard insectary conditions. Recovery rates one-hour post-treatment were high across all groups (93.5-96.6%) and did not differ from controls. Escape rate was temporarily reduced at two hours but largely recovered by 24 h, with only chilled and marked males showing persistent impairment. Fecundity and female insemination rates were unaffected by treatment. Fertility remained high in non-irradiated groups and was reduced to < 0.2% following irradiation. Longevity was not significantly affected. These results indicate that male An. arabiensis are resilient to routine SIT handling procedures. Brief chilling followed by irradiation and marking preserves key quality traits, supporting optimized operational protocols for SIT-based malaria vector control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.