ArticleScientific reports2026
A gated task-attentive multi-task network for unified retinal image analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the major causes of preventable blindness in the world, and accurate large-scale screening tools are needed urgently. Most of the deep learning methods which have been developed for retinal image analysis are treating tasks like optic disc segmentation and DR grading separately. This separation is making it difficult for the model to use the shared anatomical and contextual cues which are linking the two tasks. So we are proposing GTAM-Net, a Gated Task-Attentive Multi-Task Network for retinal image analysis. GTAM-Net is performing optic disc segmentation and DR severity grading together inside a single end-to-end network. Inside the network, a gated task-attentive block is deciding how the features should be shared between the two tasks at each layer. In this way the network is keeping the useful complementary information for each task, and at the same time it is avoiding the negative transfer which often hurts multi-task models. We are also using a multi-scale feature pyramid for keeping the hierarchical context, and an uncertainty-based loss weighting so that one task is not dominating the training. The proposed method is tested on five public datasets: IDRiD, DDR, Messidor-2, APTOS, and REFUGE. The model is reaching up to 98.17% Dice score for optic disc segmentation and 99.12% accuracy for DR grading, and the performance of the proposed method is competitive on every dataset that we tried. The cross-dataset tests are also showing that the model is fairly stable when the imaging conditions are changing. From these results, the proposed multi-task design is appearing to be a useful and reasonably stable option for joint retinal image analysis, and it can be considered for use in large screening pipelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.