Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42156782›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Views of EU citizens on economic growth and implications for climate policy.

Ivan Savin, Lewis C King, Jeroen van den Bergh, Thijs Bouman, Milan Ščasný, E Keith Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ivan SavinESCP Business School, Madrid, Spain. isavin@escp.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9469-0510
Lewis C KingInstitute of Environmental Science and Technology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6757-2503
Jeroen van den BerghInstitute of Environmental Science and Technology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.
Thijs BoumanDepartment of Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7940-892X
Milan ŠčasnýThe Environment Centre & Institute of Economic Studies at Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5040-1281
E Keith SmithDepartment of Humanities, Social and Political Sciences, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7702-0809

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although economic growth remains a central objective in policymaking and political discourse, its compatibility with environmental sustainability is increasingly contested. Yet it remains unclear whether this debate is reflected in public opinion. We therefore undertake a cross-national survey of 16,781 people across 13 EU countries to assess citizens' attitudes in this regard. We find that nearly 60% of citizens express pro-growth views, seeing economic growth as essential for a sustainable society. Of these, more than half hold a moderate and less than half a strong pro-growth view. Additionally, a third of respondents show indifference about growth, while less than 10% hold views that are sceptical about growth. Wealthier countries with less income inequality show lower support for economic growth. Pro-growth attitudes correlate positively with both self-enhancement and self-transcendence values, suggesting that citizens may view growth not only as a means for personal advancement but also as a pathway to collective wellbeing. Growth attitudes have no significant association with climate concern or climate policy support, suggesting a more nuanced picture than a traditional trade-off narrative.

Identifiers

PMID42156782
PMCPMC13381710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.