ArticleNature communications2026
Compounding hazards increase flood economic losses across Europe.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Compound events-combinations of multiple hazards contributing to societal or environmental risk-can significantly exacerbate disaster impacts, yet their effect on flood-related losses remains poorly quantified. Using a pan-European multi-hazard dataset spanning 1981-2020 at sub-national resolution, we find that more than 70% of recorded flood events involve compounding hazards, including meteorological extremes such as heatwaves and windstorms, alongside anomalous river discharge, with an increasing trend over time. The top 1% of events by economic losses are all compound, with total losses exceeding 167 billion euros above single-hazard floods. We introduce a compound hazard complexity metric and combine it with regional exposure and vulnerability data. Applying an ensemble machine learning model with explainable AI and a Double Machine Learning Causal Forest, we show that regions with higher complexity experience greater losses, even after controlling for flood magnitude and vulnerability, highlighting the importance of compound hazard information in risk modeling.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.