ArticleNature communications2026
Addressing global hotspots of drought-related crop production losses.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plant G proteins: Versatile signaling hubs for synergistic improvement of agronomic traits.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026Review
- Swapping rice for alternative cereals can reduce climate-induced production losses and increase farmer incomes in India.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Meeting future food demand requires transforming food systems to simultaneously increase production, reduce environmental impacts, and adapt to climate change. As climate variability increasingly affects production stability, understanding where cropping patterns are vulnerable to hydroclimatic stress is a missing but critical step toward improving agricultural production resilience. Here we combine gridded climate data, spatially explicit agricultural statistics, and empirical water-production functions to quantify global patterns of rainfed and irrigated crop-specific Drought Sensitivity-defined as the percent reduction in median yield under extreme hydroclimatic conditions-and drought-associated losses for 17 major crops, representing 75% of global production. This metric identifies locations where crops experience high climate variability and are most susceptible to drought-related losses. We estimate global losses of - 10.1% and - 6.8% in median rainfed and irrigated production, respectively, under historically observed extremes-enough calories to feed 2.1 billion people-and identify hotspots in the central US, eastern Brazil, the Mediterranean, and South Asia. Focusing on monsoon cereals (rice, maize, millet, sorghum), we show that sustainable irrigation expansion and targeted crop switching could avoid 62% of rainfed losses while increasing median production by 14%. This scalable framework enables proactive targeting of mitigation actions and investments to stabilize and increase global crop supply.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.