ArticleNature communications2026
Two structurally mobile regions control the conformation and function of metamorphic meiotic HORMAD proteins.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A nuclear TRiC/CCT chaperonin assembles meiotic HORMAD proteins into chromosome axes competent for crossing over.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Overlapping and separable activities of BRA-2 and HIM-17 promote occurrence and regulation of pairing and synapsis during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metamorphic HORMA domain proteins (HORMADs) nucleate protein complex formation by refolding their mobile safety belt region to bind short closure motifs on interactors. Meiotic HORMADs (mHORMADs) bind proteinaceous axial elements to orchestrate complex chromosomal events that underpin fertility, including pairing and recombination between homologous chromosomes. However, the mechanisms supporting the diverse roles of mHORMADs remain unclear. Here, we show that mHORMADs have a second structurally mobile region, the β5-αC loop, which controls mHORMAD conformation and function. Molecular dynamics and in vivo approaches show that functional specialisation of C. elegans paralogs HTP-1 and HTP-2 depends on the interplay between their β5-αC loop and safety belt. The β5-αC loop can interact with the same HORMA core surface as the safety belt and mutations that hinder this interaction prevent HTP-1 binding to closure motifs in vitro and axis loading of HTP-1 and its paralog HTP-3 in vivo. Structural predictions of mHORMADs from yeast, plants, and mammals suggest that the β5-αC loop HORMA core interaction is a conserved feature of mHORMADs. Our study reveals that mHORMADs have expanded the bimodal folding landscape first identified in Mad2, paving the way to elucidate how non-canonical HORMAD conformations control meiotic chromosome function to ensure fertility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.