ArticleMemory & cognition2026
Strategy effects and value directed recall of sub- and supra-span word lists.
Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Value cues can promote selective processing of words in lists of 12 or more items leading to better recall of memoranda associated with higher value. The current study examined whether value cues can also benefit memory for words studied in shorter lists, including those within the normative range of verbal working memory span (~four items). Across four experiments, participants studied words randomly paired with different point values in lists of three to 12 items, followed by immediate free recall. When list length varied randomly and participants could not anticipate memory set size, value-directed effects were evident for all list lengths: Words of higher-value were better recalled than lower-value words, even for lists lengths 3 and 4, demonstrating value-directed memory (VDM) effects within the canonical parameters of working memory. In contrast, with advanced knowledge of list length, value effects emerged only for lists of five or more words and overall recall was better for lower value words than when list length was unexpected, especially for shorter lists. Serial position and output order analyses corroborated these results. The current VDM effects, found in-person, and replicated with online testing, extend prior evidence indicating prioritization based on value within the parameters of working memory. The results also underscore the importance of metamemory in value-based effects: When anticipating word lists with relatively few items (three or four words), value cues can be ignored in favor of more efficient memory strategies, which results in discontinuities in VDM effects for shorter versus longer lists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.