ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2026
Deep learning-based motion correction: cardiac motion artifact and image quality improvements on chest CT.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSince the clinical application of computed tomography (CT), cardiac and respiratory motion artifacts have caused decreased image quality and reduced detection or quantitative or qualitative evaluation of lung parenchymal or vascular abnormalities on chest CT with lung window settings in patients with pulmonary diseases. Recently, a deep learning (DL)-based motion correction algorithm (CLEAR Motion) has been developed and clinically used for chest CT. We hypothesized that CLEAR Motion can significantly reduce motion artifacts on chest CT examinations relative to conventional chest CT images reconstructed without CLEAR Motion. The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of CLEAR Motion for image quality improvement in chest CT with lung window settings in patients with various pulmonary diseases. MATERIALS AND
methodsFifty-six consecutive patients with various thoracic diseases underwent non-electrocardiogram-gated chest helical CT examination using a 320-detector row CT and underwent reconstruction using the conventional reconstruction method and CLEAR Motion. To compare the quantitative image quality, the cardio-pulmonary edge distance (CPED) and slope (CPES) were measured on each CT scan in the axial plane. Comparing cardiac motion reduction capability, overall image quality, cardiac motion artifact, and region conspicuity were visually assessed in the lung window setting on the axial, coronal, and sagittal planes. The paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were then performed.
resultsThe CPEDs and CPESs of the entire lung and left lung on CT with CLEAR Motion were significantly superior to those of CT without CLEAR Motion (p < 0.001). The overall image quality, cardiac motion artifact, and region conspicuity on CT with CLEAR Motion were significantly higher than those without CLEAR Motion on each plane (p < 0.001).
conclusionThe DL-based motion correction algorithm named as 'CLEAR Motion' has a potential to improve image quality on chest CT with lung window setting in patients with pulmonary diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.