ReviewThe AAPS journal2026
Immunogenicity Assessment for siRNA Therapeutics: A Risk-Based Proposal for Event-Driven Testing.
Review in The AAPS journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oligonucleotide therapeutics (ONTs) have emerged as a transformative treatment modality with numerous products approved globally for addressing a variety of diseases. Within this class, siRNAs therapeutics have achieved remarkable success, with eight approvals to date. siRNA therapeutics are short double-stranded RNAs designed to hybridize with complementary mRNA sequences and regulate disease-related protein expression through endogenous RNA interference (RNAi) mechanism. This manuscript outlines a framework of immunogenicity risk assessment for siRNA therapeutics, discusses the challenges associated with anti-drug antibody (ADA) assay development, and reviews available immunogenicity data from both approved and investigational GalNAc-siRNA therapeutics. Across clinical development programs, GalNAc- conjugated siRNA therapeutics have demonstrated a low immunogenicity risk profile, supported by comprehensive immunogenicity risk assessment and accumulated clinical data. Reported treatment-emergent ADA response has been generally low (≤ 6%), with no observed impact on pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), efficacy and/or safety. Given the favorable immunogenicity profile observed to date, routine prospective ADA assessments throughout clinical development may not be scientifically warranted for all siRNA therapeutics. Instead, the manuscript advocates adopting a risk-based immunogenicity assessment strategy. This approach emphasizes immunogenicity risk assessment early in the program development, for low-risk molecules, such as GalNAc- or lipid-conjugated siRNA, ADA samples can be collected and banked during early phase studies for retrospective testing if evidence emerges of altered PK, PD, or immune-mediated adverse events. This risk-based immunogenicity assessment strategy ensures patient safety and therapeutic efficacy while streamlining development process for siRNA therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42156611What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.