ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Experiential learning in urologic single-port robotic surgery transition training: a qualitative descriptive study.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transitioning from multi-port to single-port robotic systems in urologic surgery requires significant team adaptation; however, the experience of clinicians during this shift remains underexplored. Therefore, this study aims to examine the effect of single-port transition training on learning experiences and perceived readiness among healthcare providers, using Kolb's experiential learning theory. Eleven physicians and 22 operating room nurses completed phased single-port transition training at a university hospital in Seoul (February-May 2025) and responded to open-ended questionnaires analyzed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis. Most experiences aligned with Kolb's learning cycle: concrete experience with single-port articulation, reflective comparison of single- and multi-port routines, abstract conceptualization of single-cannula principles, and active experimentation with collision prevention and workflow strategies. Some experienced physicians reported limited learning gains, suggesting that prior expertise reduces engagement. Nurses emphasized docking efficiency and spatial management, whereas physicians prioritized articulation control and technique refinement. Both groups reported greater confidence and interprofessional coordination. These findings suggest that integrating hands-on practice with structured reflection supports adaptation; however, the relationship between perceived readiness and clinical performance requires further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.