Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42156568›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Drug discovery2026

Realizing the potential of agonistic antibody immunotherapy.

Mark S Cragg, Xiaojie Yu, Christopher Paluch, Simon J Davis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mark S Cragg *Antibody and Vaccine Group, Centre for Cancer Immunology, School of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. msc@soton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2077-089X
Xiaojie Yu *Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, China.
Christopher Paluch *Inflammation Research, Gilead Sciences, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9087-1920
Simon J Davis *Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. simon.davis@imm.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2280-1170

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agonistic antibodies mimic the activities of native ligands by initiating signalling by the receptors they target. As stimulators of immune-cell surface receptors, they offer the prospect of resetting immune responses in autoimmune conditions or initiating new or stronger reactions in contexts such as cancer immunotherapy. Despite these theoretical advantages and preclinical promise, the use of agonistic antibodies has so far delivered only limited benefit to patients. Recently, however, considerable progress has been made in understanding their mechanisms of action, which holds the key to engineering new antibodies more likely to realize the clinical potential of this class of biologics. Agonistic antibodies that target tumour necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) superfamily proteins in the context of anti-cancer therapy have been a major focus of these studies, but substantial progress has also been made in understanding how antibodies and antibody-like molecules trigger signalling by immune receptors and cytokine receptors, creating opportunities to treat autoimmune disorders. Here, we summarize recent progress in understanding how antibodies initiate receptor signalling. We also review the clinical landscape for agonistic antibody-based immunotherapy and discuss how newly gained mechanistic insights should broaden the clinical scope and improve the safety and efficacy of the approach.

Indexed as

AntibodiesAntibodies, MonoclonalImmunotherapyAnimalsAutoimmune DiseasesHumansNeoplasmsReceptors, Tumor Necrosis FactorSignal TransductionAntibodiesAntibodies, MonoclonalReceptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.