ArticleNature2026
An AI system to help scientists write expert-level empirical software.
Article in Nature, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Self-Driving Scanning Probe Microscopy: From Acceleration to Discovery and Manipulation.Accounts of chemical research · 2026Article
- Why do AI projects fail in drug development and pharma? Insights from multi-year Pistoia Alliance studies.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Article
- Evaluating agentic AI for biological discovery in autonomous and copilot settings.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Reimagining plant science training in the era of generative artificial intelligence: a global perspective.The Plant cell · 2026Review
- Ontology-constrained multi-LLM scoring of hypothesis support in the predictive processing literature.Research square · 2026Article
- AI-Discovered Cognitive Models Reveal Novel Insights into Human and Animal Learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A comparative study of AI and human programming on environmental sustainability.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
42 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The cycle of scientific discovery is frequently bottlenecked by the slow, manual creation of software to support computational experiments
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.