ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Heart failure detection in electrocardiograms using artificial intelligence and pragmatic labelling.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Associations between echocardiographic traits and artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiography predictions of heart failure.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diagnosis of heart failure (HF) is resource-intensive, leading to severe underdiagnosis. This study proposes the use of a deep learning model to detect HF solely from electrocardiograms. HF has limited validity in diagnosis codes, lowering the viability of direct application of supervised learning. However, validating the codes with measured levels of circulating N-terminal proB-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) during training mitigates the impact of label noise. We developed and prospectively validated a neural network for HF detection, using a development cohort of 25,300 patients and an independent test cohort of 43,727 patients. The model achieved an AUC of 0.86 (95% CI 0.847-0.864) for hospital-diagnosed HF, which increased to 0.91 (95% CI 0.900-0.913) with age-adjusted NT-proBNP thresholds and 0.96 (95% CI 0.951-0.963) with stricter limits of 125 and 1000 ng/L. The model was externally validated using the MIMIC-IV cohort of 161,352 patients, yielding AUC values of 0.87 (95% CI 0.861-0.871), 0.90 (95% CI 0.895-0.908), and 0.96 (95% CI 0.950-0.964) with the same labelling strategies. Model predictions were further validated using echocardiographic assessments of diastolic function grade and the H2FPEF score, demonstrating that the model accurately captures both diastolic and systolic function. The model has been released as open source.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.