Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42156496›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Machine learning surrogate for the leaf PROSPECT-D model and its applications across plant species.

Milad Rahimi-Majd, Rudan Xu, Stefan Bauermeister, Zoran Nikoloski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Milad Rahimi-MajdBioinformatics Department, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, 14476, Potsdam, Germany.
Rudan XuBioinformatics Department, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, 14476, Potsdam, Germany.
Stefan BauermeisterBioinformatics Department, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, 14476, Potsdam, Germany.
Zoran NikoloskiBioinformatics Department, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, 14476, Potsdam, Germany. nikoloski@mpimp-golm.mpg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leaf hyperspectral reflectance (HSR) data have gained increasing attention due to their usage in predicting a range of leaf physiological, biochemical, structural, and photosynthetic traits using machine learning (ML) models. The PROSPECT family of models offers a complementary, mechanistic means to estimate leaf traits from HSR data using model inversion. However, a comprehensive evaluation of the accuracy and transferability of the PROSPECT model across a large set of species is hindered by the limited availability of ground truth data sets. Here, we employed a combination of inversion and forward simulation of the PROSPECT-D model across a broad range of species and identified four narrow wavebands linked to environmental effects. We also introduced a novel framework using partial least squares regression to enable the analysis of the transferability of the machine learning models trained base on the PROSPECT-D across species. This analysis revealed trait-specific patterns of transferability for the machine learning surrogate based on the PROSPECT-D forward model. We then extended this analysis to PROSPECT-D inversion using neural networks and developed a fast, accurate deep-learning-based surrogate inversion approach to estimate leaf traits from measured HSR data. Our data-driven framework paves the way for improving the accuracy of PROSPECT and similar mechanistic models.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPlant LeavesPlantsHyperspectral ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerPhotosynthesisPredictive Learning ModelsLeaf hyperspectral reflectanceMachine learningModel inversionModel transferabilityPROSPECT-D model

Identifiers

PMID42156496
PMCPMC13187411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.