Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42156479›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Management strategies of multinational corporations' green supply chains by deep reinforcement learning.

Dan Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Dan GaoSchool of Business, Wuxi Taihu University, Wuxi, 214064, China. 15605299288@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multinational corporations (MNCs) face the dual challenge of optimizing sustainability performance along with operational efficiency within complex global supply chains, particularly under emerging trade regulations such as the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. This study aims to develop an intelligent decision-making framework to support both strategic and real-time optimization in green supply chain management (G-SCM). The proposed approach integrates an improved Transformer architecture with deep reinforcement learning (DRL) by modeling the dynamic supply chain environment as a Markov Decision Process. Environmental indicators, such as carbon emissions and energy consumption, are coupled with operational metrics, including inventory turnover and order fulfillment rates, into a unified reward function. A hierarchical attention mechanism is employed to capture the high-dimensional dependencies among supplier relationships, logistics pathways, and green practices. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model significantly outperforms traditional DRL baselines in reducing carbon emissions, increasing renewable energy usage, and maintaining high order fulfillment rates. The inclusion of a supply chain complexity index further enhances robustness against disruptions. Additional analysis reveals that the model's attention weights reflect the relative influence of key decision variables on overall optimization, providing interpretable pathways for multi-objective coordination in supply chains. Overall, this study presents an intelligent optimization method capable of real-time adaptation to complex supply chain dynamics while balancing environmental and operational performance, providing valuable insights for both practical G-SCM operations and policy formulation.

Indexed as

Attention mechanismDeep reinforcement learningGreen supply chain managementMulti-objective optimizationSupply chain resilience

Identifiers

PMID42156479
PMCPMC13389412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.