ArticleScientific reports2026
Intelligent audit decision support for enterprise related-party transactions based on knowledge graph and graph neural network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Related-party transactions (RPTs) occupy a central position in contemporary corporate governance, serving as essential channels for resource allocation among affiliated business entities. The growing complexity of ownership arrangements and globalized operations has made RPT auditing increasingly challenging for financial professionals. Traditional audit methodologies struggle with intricate enterprise relationship networks that often span multiple jurisdictions and involve layered ownership through shell companies, rendering manual inspection approaches both time-consuming and incomplete. Despite advances in computational approaches, significant gaps persist in current research and practice. Existing audit systems inadequately capture the multi-dimensional relationships connecting enterprises, shareholders, executives, and transactions. Most machine learning methods treat transactions as independent observations, thereby ignoring the relational context that distinguishes legitimate RPTs from irregular ones. Furthermore, the dynamic nature of enterprise relationships demands adaptive models capable of tracking temporal evolution, yet static snapshots of relationship networks may produce outdated or misleading risk assessments. Four critical challenges must be addressed for effective RPT audit automation: modeling heterogeneous entity types linked through diverse relationship categories with different audit implications; capturing temporal dynamics as ownership structures change through acquisitions and personnel movements; providing interpretable outputs that support professional judgment and regulatory inspection; and integrating domain knowledge with data-driven learning in a coherent framework. This study develops an intelligent decision support system that bridges knowledge graph technology with graph neural network architectures to address these challenges. The proposed framework constructs a domain-specific knowledge graph capturing multi-dimensional enterprise relationships through entity resolution and temporal modeling. An enhanced graph neural network employs heterogeneous attention mechanisms alongside temporal fusion components to learn relationship-aware representations. Interpretable risk assessment emerges through attention weight visualization and risk propagation path analysis. Experimental evaluation on real-world enterprise data demonstrates substantial improvements over baseline methods, with practical deployment confirming utility for detecting undisclosed relationships and pricing anomalies in accounting firm engagements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.