ArticleScientific reports2026
Methodological validation and inter-site analysis in Late Bronze and Early Iron Age cremations using tooth cementum annulation counts.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Estimating age at death in archaeological populations is often limited by poor skeletal preservation, particularly in cremated remains. Tooth cementum annulation counts (TCAc), based on incremental lines of Salter (ILS), offer a promising alternative. In this study, TCAc is evaluated in terms of feasibility, microstructural preservation and internal consistency in cremated archaeological teeth, focusing on methodological applicability rather than chronological accuracy. We analysed 62 roots from eight Lusatian Urnfield culture cemeteries in southwestern Poland, dating to the Late Bronze and Early Iron Age. Undecalcified transverse sections were prepared, and ILS were examined alongside two complementary indicators: ILS width (ILSw) and the ratio of acellular extrinsic fibre cementum thickness to ILSw (AEFCt/ILSw). Results showed good intra- and inter-observer repeatability of ILSc, and both AEFCt and ILSc displayed significant age-related increases (p < 0.01). Combined estimates based on TCAc and AEFCt/ILSw yielded narrower age ranges than morphology alone. ILSw did not differ by sex, age group or tooth type, but varied significantly between cemeteries (p < 0.001), potentially reflecting environmental or life-history factors. These findings indicate that TCAc shows practical potential for use on cremated archaeological material, while also highlighting the need for future comparisons with known-age collections to refine interpretative standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.