ArticleScientific reports2026
Son preference and regional inequalities in girls undernutrition in India.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Spatial non-stationarity in son preference: a district-level geographically weighted regression analysis of NFHS-5 in India.International journal of health geographics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Child malnutrition in India remains among the highest globally, with persistent gender disparities rooted in son preference. Although girls are biologically more resilient, they often receive less food and care in son preferring households. Using nationally representative data from the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5, 2019-21), this study analysed 112,255 girls aged 0-59 months to examine how son preference influences stunting, wasting, and underweight across India's regions. Son preference was defined as mothers desiring more sons than daughters in their ideal family composition. Generalized linear models with logit links were used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (ORs), controlling for child, maternal, and household characteristics, with analyses conducted nationally and across six regions. Nationally, girls in son preferring households had slightly higher odds of stunting (OR = 1.02; 95% CI: 1.00-1.04), wasting (OR = 1.02; 95% CI: 1.00-1.04), and underweight (OR = 1.02; 95% CI: 1.00-1.04). Regionally, disparities were more pronounced in Central (stunting: OR = 1.04; underweight: OR = 1.06) and Eastern India (stunting: OR = 1.03; underweight: OR = 1.04), while Southern and Northeastern regions showed negligible or reversed associations. Maternal education, higher household wealth, and better maternal nutritional status were protective factors. These findings indicate that son preference contributes to modest but meaningful disadvantages in girls' nutritional outcomes, particularly in more patriarchal regions. Targeted, gender-transformative strategies within existing nutrition programs are needed, with priority attention to Central and Eastern India while drawing lessons from more gender-equitable regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.