ArticleScientific reports2026
Sugar-mediated physical constraints drive the evolution of pollination drops into nectar.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is now well established that the chemical composition of ovular secretions in gymnosperms and angiosperms plays a key role in pollination biology, and the evolutionary history of this chemical profile has attracted considerable attention. In this work, for the first time, we focus on the physical properties of ovular secretions and their potential central role in the evolutionary success of angiosperms. Through wettability measurements on model systems, artificial secretions deposited on female cones of Taxus baccata, chosen as a representative gymnosperm species, we demonstrate that at the cone apex, characterized by 3D confocal scanning profilometry, a highly hydrophobic interaction arises. This interaction depends on both the nanostructure of the cone surface and the specific sugar composition typical of the pollination drop, enabling the secretion to maintain an almost perfect droplet shape and thereby maximizing the interception of airborne pollen grains. Additional observations performed by optical microscopy on the same solutions revealed that the chemical composition of the pollination drop, that is typically dominated by glucose and fructose and low in sucrose, ensures a high degree of pollen stabilization at the droplet surface, unlike solutions having higher concentration of sucrose, such as those typical of angiosperm nectar, which appear highly unstable. Overall the results point out that the sugar profile of the pollination drop is optimal for maximizing airborne pollen capture and to interact with pollen grains once this has landed on the drop. On the other hand this was most probably a constraint that reduced the possibility of chemical adaptation of pollination drop to interact with new pollinating agents, i.e. insects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.