ArticleScientific reports2026
Thyroid disease detection using enhanced extreme learning machine based on drop-connect method.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The long-term physiologic effects of thyroid problems make them one of the most important endocrine disorders. Even if a lot of machine learning and deep learning techniques have been presented out for the early detection of thyroid disease, it is still difficult to achieve reliable and clinically accurate multi-class diagnostic performance. In this work, we suggest an Enhanced Extreme Learning Machine (EELM) that uses Drop-Connect regularization to enhance generalization and reduce over-fitting that is frequently seen in traditional ELM models. The pipeline for the suggested framework consists of seven steps: data preprocessing, model building, training, and evaluation. To simulate a clinically relevant diagnostic scenario, the model was assessed on a unified four-class thyroid classification task (hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, sick-euthyroid, and normal). The suggested EELM demonstrated steady and reliable multi-class performance with an average accuracy of approximately 82% under 10-fold cross-validation. The model achieved up to 99.89% accuracy in comparative binary classification studies (e.g., hypothyroid vs. normal), indicating the better division of some thyroid diseases. Accuracy, precision, recall, specificity, sensitivity, F1-score, ROC, and AUC measures were used to evaluate performance. The suggested method's robustness and significance were validated statistically using ANOVA and paired t-tests. Significant improvements over baseline models were confirmed by statistical validation with paired t-tests and ANOVA (p < 0.05). Overall, the findings show that the suggested EELM offers a clinically applicable, statistically supported, and computationally effective method for classifying thyroid diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.