Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42156417›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Quantum machine learning for predicting anastomotic leak: a clinical study.

Vojtěch Novák, Ivan Zelinka, Lenka Přibylová, Lubomír Martínek, Vladimír Benčurik

Abstract readClinical Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vojtěch NovákDepartment of Computer Science, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic. vojtech.novak.st1@vsb.cz.
Ivan ZelinkaDepartment of Computer Science, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Lenka PřibylováDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Lubomír MartínekDepartment of Surgical Studies, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Vladimír BenčurikSurgical Department, Hospital AGEL Novy Jicin, Novy Jicin, Czech Republic.

Funding

VSB-Technical University of Ostrava grant of SGS No. SP2025/072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anastomotic leak is a life-threatening complication following colorectal surgery. This study benchmarks Quantum Neural Networks (QNNs) against hyperparameter-tuned classical models (logistic regression, multi-layer perceptrons, boosting algorithms) for anastomotic leak prediction. Using a 200-patient clinical dataset strictly bounded by a priori medical constraints, we simulated QNNs with ZZFeatureMap encoding and EfficientSU2/RealAmplitudes ansatze under realistic hardware noise. To ensure statistical reliability, performance metrics were averaged across 10 independent optimization runs. The EfficientSU2-BFGS configuration achieved the highest mean AUC of [Formula: see text], while RealAmplitudes with CMA-ES maximized Average Precision ([Formula: see text]). Crucially, at a fixed, clinically necessary sensitivity of [Formula: see text], specific QNN configurations achieved significantly higher specificity (up to [Formula: see text]) and Negative Predictive Value (up to [Formula: see text]) compared to classical models (maximum [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], respectively), effectively minimizing false positives. However, classical models maintained superior probability calibration for continuous risk stratification. We conclude that QNNs offer robust discriminative performance for clinical screening, warranting further validation on larger, independent cohorts.

Indexed as

Anastomotic LeakNeural Networks, ComputerPrediction AlgorithmsFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleQuantum Mechanics

Identifiers

PMID42156417
PMCPMC13187465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.