ArticleScientific data2026
Whole-genome sequences of 240 indigenous African cattle from Egypt, Uganda, and South Africa.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Indigenous cattle are central to livestock production in Africa, valued for their adaptability to harsh tropical environments despite lower productivity than commercial breeds. Genome analyses offer critical insights into the genetic potential for enhancing both resilience and productive traits, supporting the advancement of worldwide cattle farming systems. Here, we generated whole-genome sequence data for 240 indigenous cattle representing breeds from distinct agro-climatic regions in Egypt, Uganda, and South Africa. The dataset comprises over ten terabytes of paired-end reads generated using the Illumina NovaSeq. 6000 platform, with an average genome coverage of approximately 10×. Post-filtering reads were mapped to the ARS-UCD1.2 reference genome with a mean mapping rate of 99.2% (range: 64.5-99.9%). Variant calling identified ~43 million SNPs and 6 million indels (≤50 bp) unevenly distributed across the genome. Functional annotation indicated that many variants were located within or near known genes. This comprehensive genomic resource provides a foundation for future studies of genetic diversity, breed identity, population structure, local adaptation, breed-specific traits, or strategies for global cattle conservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.