Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42156375›Full record

ReviewAnatomy & cell biology2026

The foramen of Magendie: a comprehensive review of its history, anatomy, pathology, and surgical approaches.

Brendan Bych, Brianna L Hines, Noritaka Komune, Joseph Lockwood, Carmine Antonio Donofrio, Filippo Badaloni, Antonio Fioravanti, Aaron S Dumont, Joe Iwanaga, R Shane Tubbs

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Anatomy & cell biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Brendan BychDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8111-2591
Brianna L HinesDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9740-0275
Noritaka KomuneDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9521-9878
Joseph LockwoodDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5289-7011
Carmine Antonio DonofrioDepartment of Neurosurgery, ASST Cremona, Cremona, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9123-8158
Filippo BadaloniDepartment of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0041-0945
Antonio FioravantiDepartment of Neurosurgery, ASST Cremona, Cremona, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6205-3744
Aaron S DumontDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8077-8992
Joe IwanagaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8502-7952
R Shane TubbsDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1317-1047

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The foramen of Magendie (FOM), or median aperture, represents a critical anatomical structure allowing cerebrospinal fluid outflow from the fourth ventricle into the cisterna magna. Since its description by François Magendie in the 19th century, its existence, embryological development, and clinical importance have been subjects of debate and refinement. This review synthesizes the historical context, developmental biology, and anatomical nuances of the FOM, alongside its involvement in congenital and acquired pathologies, particularly Blake's pouch cysts, Dandy-Walker malformations, and obstructive neoplasms. We further analyze controversies surrounding its recognition in early literature, anatomical variants including agenesis, and its surgical implications. Surgical approaches such as the telovelar and transvermian routes are compared, with emphasis on minimizing morbidity while ensuring exposure. Advances in neuroimaging and microsurgical technique have reinforced the FOM's relevance in modern neurosurgery. A comprehensive understanding of its anatomy, pathology, and historical discourse is essential for anatomists, neurosurgeons, and clinicians managing posterior fossa pathologies.

Indexed as

AnatomyCerebrospinal fluidFourth ventricleHistoryNeurosurgery

Identifiers

PMID42156375
PMCPMC13616761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.