ReviewAnatomy & cell biology2026
The foramen of Magendie: a comprehensive review of its history, anatomy, pathology, and surgical approaches.
Review in Anatomy & cell biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The foramen of Magendie (FOM), or median aperture, represents a critical anatomical structure allowing cerebrospinal fluid outflow from the fourth ventricle into the cisterna magna. Since its description by François Magendie in the 19th century, its existence, embryological development, and clinical importance have been subjects of debate and refinement. This review synthesizes the historical context, developmental biology, and anatomical nuances of the FOM, alongside its involvement in congenital and acquired pathologies, particularly Blake's pouch cysts, Dandy-Walker malformations, and obstructive neoplasms. We further analyze controversies surrounding its recognition in early literature, anatomical variants including agenesis, and its surgical implications. Surgical approaches such as the telovelar and transvermian routes are compared, with emphasis on minimizing morbidity while ensuring exposure. Advances in neuroimaging and microsurgical technique have reinforced the FOM's relevance in modern neurosurgery. A comprehensive understanding of its anatomy, pathology, and historical discourse is essential for anatomists, neurosurgeons, and clinicians managing posterior fossa pathologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.