Article in Environmental science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Yiman GaoState Key Laboratory of Regional Environment and Sustainability, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Mingxu LiuState Key Laboratory of Regional Environment and Sustainability, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1419-1990
Weili LinKey Laboratory of Ecology and Environment in Minority Areas, Minzu University of China, National Ethnic Affairs Commission, Beijing 100081, China.
Hongli WangKey Laboratory of Formation and Prevention of Urban Air Pollution Complex, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Shanghai Academy of Environmental Sciences, Shanghai 200233, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0655-3389
Junji CaoInstitute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Yuepeng PanInstitute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5547-0849
Huabin DongState Key Laboratory of Regional Environment and Sustainability, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Limin ZengState Key Laboratory of Regional Environment and Sustainability, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Qiang ZhangMinistry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System Modeling, Department of Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Song GuoState Key Laboratory of Regional Environment and Sustainability, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9661-2313
Min HuState Key Laboratory of Regional Environment and Sustainability, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4816-9123
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Nitrate aerosol formation modulates the global nitrogen cycle and dominates fine-particle pollution in many urban areas worldwide. Over the past two decades, increasing studies have suggested a pronounced enhancement of nitrate formation by reductions in sulfate levels via shifts in aerosol thermodynamic equilibrium. However, we clarify a distinct sustained regime in winter haze that does not result in the expected nitrate enhancement, following drastic SO
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Rethinking Nitrate Aerosol Substitution for Sulfate in Winter Haze. · full record | OpenQuestion