ArticleBritish journal of haematology2026
Fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT): Survey of UK fetal medicine centres on antenatal management of subsequent affected pregnancies.
Article in British journal of haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT) is a rare condition associated with severe fetal thrombocytopenia and intracerebral haemorrhage. Antenatal management of subsequent pregnancies relies on intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg); yet, practice varies internationally and UK data are limited. We conducted a national survey to characterise the current antenatal management of FNAIT across UK regional fetal medicine centres using an electronic, scenario-based design. Responses were analysed descriptively, with ≥75% concordance considered strong agreement. Sixteen of 22 regional fetal medicine centres (73%) responded; all respondents were fetal medicine specialists or haematologists. There was strong consensus to treat standard- and high-risk pregnancies associated with anti-human platelet antigen (HPA)1a or anti-HPA5b antibodies using weekly IVIg, most commonly at a dose of 1 g/kg/week. Earlier initiation of IVIg was favoured for high-risk pregnancies, while timing was more variable for standard-risk cases. Corticosteroids were not routinely used in standard-risk pregnancies but were considered in high-risk scenarios. Fetal blood sampling and intrauterine platelet transfusion were generally avoided. Considerable variation was observed in delivery planning and in the management of pregnancies at risk without a prior confirmed diagnosis. This survey demonstrates the areas of both consistency and variation in UK practice, highlighting gaps in the evidence base and priorities for future research and guidelines development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.