ArticleBMJ open2026
Patient and family experiences of sedation in an urban academic tertiary-level intensive care unit in Canada: a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSedation is commonly used in critically ill patients to facilitate procedures and care as well as provide comfort but can carry risks such as delirium and prolonged mechanical ventilation. Although current guidelines advocate for light sedation, sedation practices are influenced by clinicians' subjective interpretations. Patients and families may experience distress and unmet needs, and little is known about their perspectives and experiences in the context of contemporary light sedation practices.
objectiveThis study aimed to understand the perceptions and experiences of both patient and family members in the intensive care unit (ICU) of current sedation practices. SETTINGS: Canadian, closed, mixed ICU setting.
participantsCritically ill adult patients and adult family members.
methodsPatients and family members were interviewed, using a semi-structured interview questionnaire, and Braun and Clarke inductive thematic analysis was used to identify themes and subthemes in the data.
resultsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 10 family members and 10 patients. Family members and patients reported that sedation was needed for patient comfort. Family members also described the need for sedation for patient and staff safety, as well as their own comfort. While both groups described sedation as necessary for enduring the medical procedures in the ICU, both groups reported concerns of sedation use, including negative physiological and cognitive patient outcomes. Patients and family members also recommended strategies for improving how sedation use is communicated in the ICU.
conclusionsPerceptions and experiences of patient and families with sedation care practices in the ICU were multifaceted with both positive and negative outcomes reported including psychological and emotional concerns with sedation use. Key recommendations were provided for improving sedation practices with families emphasising the need for family-centred care and patients highlighting the need for self-determination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.