ArticleBMJ global health2026
Prioritising communicable disease research in Afghanistan: an application of the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) methodology.
Article in BMJ global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionCommunicable disease control in Afghanistan has deteriorated amid growing fragility, health system disruption and declining international aid since the 2021 regime change. Outbreaks of measles, pertussis, pneumonia, cholera, malaria, dengue, Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever, tuberculosis and polio continue to plague the population in Afghanistan. This study addresses a critical evidence gap by systematically ranking research priorities for communicable diseases in Afghanistan.
methodsThis study applied the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) methodology, which is a widely used approach for systematic, transparent and collaborative research priority setting. It leverages expert consultation to generate, score and rank research questions. This study identified and invited 303 Afghanistan-health researchers, based globally, to complete the survey which consisted of 33 research questions related to communicable diseases that were submitted by 15 researchers.
resultsThis CHNRI exercise included 44 respondents, 63.6% of whom were of Afghan origin. The top 10 highest-ranked questions focused on identifying barriers to low measles and polio vaccination coverage, assessing disease burden by region and strategies to reduce the incidence of tuberculosis. Respondents of Afghan origin ranked antibiotic resistance and gender-related disparities in tuberculosis as the highest-priority questions. The majority of priority questions were description questions.
conclusionsResearchers, governments, donors, policy makers and programme implementers can use these findings as a starting point to strategically align research agendas, guide resource allocation, and prioritise evidence-based interventions for life-saving communicable disease prevention and control in Afghanistan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.