ArticleBiomedical physics & engineering express2026
A portable closed-loop platform enabling cortical evoked potential operant conditioning: system development and validation of target intensity estimation.
Article in Biomedical physics & engineering express, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study presents customizations and evaluations aimed at adapting a closed-loop platform designed for cortical evoked potential operant conditioning into a portable, user-friendly platform for real-time neurofeedback applications. Such applications can be useful for development of novel sensory and motor evoked response feedback approaches for rehabilitating lost function due to a brain or spinal injury. The current version of this system is component-heavy, and our primary goal was to reduce its footprint by integrating components, while supporting quality data acquisition, and without compromising real-time feedback. One key limitation in transitioning to a portable and integrated biosignal acquisition system is their typically lower sampling rates (e.g. 300-600 Hz) compared to high-resolution systems (e.g. 3200 Hz), typically used for detecting transient muscle and reflex responses (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.